Every finding points back to evidence.
Source document, page or span, registry record, applicable rule, and amendment history stay attached.
Deterministic compliance infrastructure
Regulated decisions, computed and evidenced.
Tasaab turns documents, registries, spatial evidence, and operational data into reviewable obligations, deterministic controls, and auditable deliverables. Every finding has a source. Every threshold is decided by code.
Control assessmentSources reconciled
Registry recordPMP-2026-014Source ID attached
Decision fileTender dossier · p. 18Source span verified
01Control
Deterministic evaluationEVIDENCE VERIFIEDRule citation · source IDs · audit trail attached
01 / Ground truthScroll to inspect
What the buyer gets
A finding you can defend.
The homepage promise is operational: evidence remains visible, rules remain testable, uncertainty remains explicit, and accountable people remain in control.
Code decides thresholds—not a language model.
Dates, amounts, geometry, ratios, and legal limits are evaluated by testable rules.
Missing evidence cannot become a confident answer.
Failed sources, unverified rules, and absent field facts become visible tasks or escalations.
The accountable professional makes the decision.
Tasaab prepares reviewable work; controllers and qualified professionals validate and approve it.
One architectural decision
The model writes sentences. It never decides whether they are lawful.
Evidence enters as fact
Government GIS, registry records, measurements, and cited statutory text.
Code decides the threshold
Geometry, arithmetic, temporal rules, and formal proofs remain deterministic.
The professional remains in control
Drafts are unsigned and uncertainty becomes an explicit field task or refusal.
Solution landscape
Four regulated workflows. Different maturity, one hard boundary.
Public procurement is the current pilot track. Natural resources, environmental due diligence, and land development run on the shared deterministic engine today.
01Pilot track
Public procurement control
Décret n° 2-22-431 · CDC / CRC
Procurement plans, tender dossiers, evaluations, awards, and probity records transformed into traceable findings and controller deliverables.
Explore this workflow02Runs end to end
Natural resources
FRPA · FPPR · GAR · RCW 76.09 · WAC 222
British Columbia and Washington forestry evidence assembled into reviewable obligations and unsigned filing packs.
Explore this workflow03Runs end to end
Environmental due diligence
40 CFR Part 312 · MTCA
Government-record searches grounded in public federal requirements, without reproducing proprietary ASTM tables.
Explore this workflow04Runs end to end
Land development
SEPA · Critical Areas Ordinances
Parcel constraints and buildable-area calculations against jurisdiction-specific rules.
Explore this workflowPilot track · Public procurement
The CDC challenge fit
Procurement controls, computed rather than sampled.
The same deterministic boundary can cross-examine procurement plans, tender dossiers, bids, evaluation records, awards, and probity declarations—then carry each finding into controller review and formal reporting.
Documents→Facts→Controls→Findings→Review
This is a pilot solution track. The guided dossier is simulated; target-environment acceptance and controller-labelled validation remain to be completed with CDC/CRC.
Explore the procurement workflowMISSING_FIELD_FACT
REFUSE
Wetland rating not present in mapped data.
Refusal is a product feature
“Unknown” is safer than a plausible number.
If a layer fails, a statutory table is unverified, or a field determination is missing, Tasaab does not quietly fill the gap. It records what is missing, where to inspect, and who must decide.
Read the known limitationsBuilt by the founder
25+ years in high-stakes infrastructure.
Tawfik Garaouy founded Tasaab to bring infrastructure discipline to enterprise AI and regulatory systems—where evidence, traceability, and deterministic controls matter.
Meet the companyEvaluate before you licence
Bring one real file. Try to break it.
Run a bounded evaluation against your jurisdiction, your evidence, and your professional review standard.